DM235 said:
And fans are always supporting silly decisions by their champion. I find it less "evil" when a company plays catch up with a competitor, than a company who goes against the status quo. I am sure that Nintendo did a financial model, and they are expecting to make more money with a higher price (as opposed to more units sold at a lower price), because they are expecting a certain amount of hard core fans to pay anything. |
It's not "hardcore" fans. It's the traditional gamer.
Nintendo knows that teh majority of the people buying the Switch will just use the controller that comes with. They are taking advantage of the traditional gamer that "NEEDS" it's traditional controller. They know that those people will buy the controller regardless, because they believe that there is no other way to game.
Besides, as many have pointed out, its hardly a price difference from competitors. Like what $5, maybe $10. And I bet many of those would hand you $5 or $10 right now if you made thier controllers battery last 10x longer than it does now.







