It's a bad thing the Switch isn't being sold at a loss?

[AngryLittleAlchemist]

Intrinsic said:

AngryLittleAlchemist said:

This argument makes no sense. The Switch is a product that does more for than the Iphone and Samsung Galaxy despite the fact that it costs less to produce and the profit margin is much smaller. If anything, you are proving why the Switch SHOULD be 300$. Because even if it's 200$ to make(which I even have doubts about it being that low) it's profit margin would only be 100$ as opposed to a phone which offers more features, sure, but gets sold for ridiculously more new. So if anything, you're making Nintendo look fairer with this comparison.

Sorry, the switch does more than a smartphone?

Well, at least I see why the point makes no sense to you. 

I've said before, lets just leave it alone. I bow out of this discussion. However much any individual person thinks the switch is worth to them is all that matters at the end of the day.

In gaming, yes. I don't understand how a handheld home console with console quality games for 300$ when most phones are 700-800$ when they first release is ridiculous tbh