It's a bad thing the Switch isn't being sold at a loss?

[Intrinsic]

Hynad said:

Intrinsic said:

replies in bold.

Now everything I just posted in bold above, are things I have said through out this thread. I have never said that the NS should be sold at this or that price, I have simply said that contrary to what the OP thinks, I believe that NS selling at $299 is already being sold at a premium.

You are arguing quite a lot against the idea of a company selling a console at a profit if that's really the case. 

Sigh,,,, and you are a little too concerned about my stance on a products value..... a stance that I have every right to have.

I feel the switch is coming in at a price that is too high, I also feel utside of them wanting to make a lot of money from the actual hardware its not an all round smart approach  to take. I feel nintendo would have done a lot better with regard to their total sell through for 2017 if they came in at $250. 

Now please tell me, what is wrong with me thinking this way? And what is your problem with me thinking this way?

I've given numerous examples, the PS4 cost sony around $384 to make. Yet they sold it for $400. Only making $16 profit on the hardware which was probably also split between them and the retailer. It has gone on to sell 50M+ in record time. Why is it so hard for you to accept that the price hardware comes in has a big role to play on how suceessful said hardware goes on to be?