AngryLittleAlchemist on 06 February 2017
| Intrinsic said: To help shed some more light on this..... take the samsung galaxy s7 comes with 64GB (more than the NS) of storage, a battery, both front and rear cameras, 4GB of Ram (same type and amount of ram in the NS) a more expensive SOC (yes its processor costs more than the tegra used in the NS), fingerprint sensor, and a QHD screen (4 times the resolution of the screen in the NS) All that, costs under $255. Any iphone you see costs under $270 to make. So why exactly does the NS cost $299 again? |
This argument makes no sense. The Switch is a product that does more for than the Iphone and Samsung Galaxy despite the fact that it costs less to produce and the profit margin is much smaller. If anything, you are proving why the Switch SHOULD be 300$. Because even if it's 200$ to make(which I even have doubts about it being that low) it's profit margin would only be 100$ as opposed to a phone which offers more features, sure, but gets sold for ridiculously more new. So if anything, you're making Nintendo look fairer with this comparison.
