clickbait as hell. I wont bother talking about pro life vs pro choice (my stance is pro choice with some exceptions but I see nothing wrong with exploring giving the father a say like this law does) but I want to point out how idiotic it is to classify this as a "law that enables rapist to sue woman who wants abortion"....
first of all you need to understand that just because someone has found some crazy loophole to be able to sue doesn't mean they will win. Who the fuck would side with a rapist on this case? This is like condemning property rights because an attempted murderer has the legal option to sue the victim for breaking his screen door while trying to escape. The rapist will be locked up very quickly if they were to ever come forward to try and sue the victim. This is has be the biggest outrage fabrication story, from a big news org, that ive seen in a while.
btw the law gives the father a say and RT noticed it didn't exclude rapist so they decided "Rapist can now sue victims seeking abortion!" disgusting journalism.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
