Rapists can now sue victims seeking abortions

[eva01beserk]

VGPolyglot said:

eva01beserk said:

Not her body, the baby. Keep in mind that this procedure is for a fetus in the second trimester. Its already consider a baby just getting nutrients from the mother. where you to tel me that the mother is in danger due to the pregnancy, then yea, its her decicion completly. But since that is very rare now days with the advancements in tech we have, then both parents get a say.

The fetus cannot live without the mother. If the fetus becomes detached, and cannot survive, it's part an extension of the woman, and she should have the final say to what happens to her body. Also, it's not like the women are deciding to abort their children like they decide what to eat for breakfast: there is an extreme emotional response to their choices, and it's not like it's easy for them to decide.

The same could be said about conjoined twins where one holds some vital organ or even the entire body. Does the main body have the say in removing the parasitic one if is alive and conscious? I would say yes, but thats not the point. 

Im not pro life in any way, I say get rid of the fetus at any stage, but thats just me. I know some want the baby. and by that stage its alive, its completly dependent of the mother yes, but its not like ne borns are out there working and suporting themselfs either. 

You think is easy for a father to just cry in a coner completly powerles as his wife is about to go kill a baby he always wanted?