By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
VGPolyglot said:
Aura7541 said:

No I'm not. If your argument is solely dependent on strawman fallacies, then you have no argument at all. In addition, the law that constitute riots a crime apply to both left and right-wing extremism. If right-wingers riot, then they are breaking the law, too.

How am I strawmanning? You're referring to leftists when you actually mean liberals. And your last two sentences prove my point: police are allowed to beat people up and arrest them, without getting in trouble, so it's very obvious that the laws are favouring the establishment.

This is still a strawman fallacy. You are just making this assertion repeatedly without substantiating it. Your last sentence is also irrelevent because that pertains to a different topic altogether: police brutality. As a result, no, the laws are not favoring the establishment. The definition of a riot according to Californian law is apolitical.