Barkley said:
Sigh.... Sony G&S doesn't have a "Net Profit" They both have Operating Profits, so compare the figure we do have and Sony G&S is outperforming Nintendo. It's not difficult to understand. There is no reason to compare Net Profit to Operating Profit over Operating Profit to Operating Profit other then biased cherry picking.
Net Profit Nintendo - $570m Sony G&S - N/A Winner - N/A
Operating Profit Nintendo - $277.6m Sony G&S - $431m Winner - Sony G&S |
Of Course that Sony G&S does not have net profit beacuse its just one part of Sony and thats why whole and only profit for Sony G&S actually is operating profit, whole Sony company has net profit Sony G&S doesnt, and that operating profit is lower than whole profit Nintendo made. Like wrote, in other words whole Nintendo made higher profit than Sony G&S despite "PSN brings in more money than all of Nintendo".
I agree thats not at all hard to understand, its very simple whole Nintendo has higher profit than Sony G&S and whole Sony company actually, but PSN has higher revenue and higher operating profit than Nintendo.
