Barkley said:
Why are you comparing Net Profit to Operating Profit rather than Operating profit to Operating Profit? There is no "Net-Profit" for Sony's gaming divison, so logically if you want to make a comparison use Operating Profit for both. Unless you're cherry picking. It's silly to compare two different types of figures when you have two of the same. |
Because operating profit it's not profit for whole Nintendo, and OP specifically said "PSN brings in more money than all of Nintendo". Like I wrote, we know that whole Nintendo made profit of $570m, PSN has just an operating income and that's actually profit PSN made. So its not hard to understand that Sony Game & Network Services (G&S) with operating income of $431m made less profit than whole Nintendo with profit of $570m.
So PSN has higher revenue than whole NIntendo, but whole Nintendo has higher profit, also whole Sony made 3x less profit than whole Nintendo. Not relly hard to understand.
