| Zkuq said: 1. We're not talking about a violent regime just yet, at least internally in the United States. The police force sure is quite violent, but the regime itself isn't. 2. Doesn't mean it's a good way. It's a pretty natural symptom of the problems, but it's still not a better way to solve things. What has violence solved so far? Not much, I don't think. 3. Personally I think that free speech is a value that should be limited only under very careful consideration, but there should be limits to racism. All critical speech can and must not be quelled, but some, uh, moderation should be done. It should mostly be related to not sticking to facts and obviously inciting hate, I believe. |
1. The United States has been violent since its inception, starting with slaves existing and women not being allowed to vote, to Japanese people being forcefully relocated in internment camps, to having a prison system filled with millions of people. Donald Trump is certinaly going to continue this, in his debate he said that he wanted stop and frisk and that we needed more police so that we can "law and order".
2. The fact that it hasn't really been successful shows that the people that are complaining are "SJWs" and "the left" ruining games and society is just flat out wrong. But if we're talking about what it has accomplished, I'm pretty sure that a certain war ended slavery in the United States.
3. The problem arises when we are asking what are facts? The Trump administration is already going on about "alternative facts".
