By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Veknoid_Outcast said:

 

Remember all those Vita critics (most of whom probably didn't own a Vita and never intended to own one) who mocked the system because of all its games were playable elsewhere? Um, who cares? It has a huge library of indie and Japanese "AA" games. The fact that they're available elsewhere is moot. They're also available on Vita, and playable on the go. Would these critics rather the Vita had fewer games? In a world where fewer games is never a good thing, that just doesn't make sense.

 

overall i really agree with you. more games is always better.*

however, vita failed to also carve out a set of exclusive of it's own.  it is important to have some "carrots" that justify this system over just any system.  but still,.. a lot of the "ps4" game i buy i don't play on ps4.  i play them on vita because i can and because i like to play games on my commute.  i love that even after vita very objectively failed it is still really well support.

 

 

*but the platform owner needs to make their store front navigatable to the games i want to play.  i have trouble with apple because it is really hard to find something on their store that isn't a "top ten" app.  the fact i have to use other sources to find games on their service is a deterrentto me.