By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
BraLoD said:
bananaking21 said:

the combat isnt as good as Bloodborne. but its good. but as a game? it beats bloodborne. and Horizon will have an almost impossible task of beating TW3. TW3 just set the standard way to damn high for it. 

The bar was set up 1999 and is never going down, anyway, but Horizon should beat TW3, my LoDometer is telling me that.

yeah... no. combat wise sure, Horizon does seem to have more fluid combat. but TW3 is very deep. Lore, world, story, story telling, side quests, characters, back story of those characters, enemies, number of monsters, actions going around in the world, and picking your actions. those all play a huge role in making TW3 being SO DAMN GOOD. also there are things like preparing for a fight with potions, oils, decotions and picking the right bombs, also upgrading and crafting all those. looking up the monster you are up against and picking the right ones, plus using the right signs against it. combat can be mindless hack and slash, or a lot more tactical than most people know. 

again the bar that The Witcher 3 set for action RPG's is very damn high, and thats because it excells at pretty much everything. do i want Horizon to be better? of course, that means i get to play a more awesome game. but do i think it will be better? i honestly doubt it.