By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 25 January 2017
Edit Thread
Alkibiádēs said:
BraLoD said:

So it's not "impressive" because Sony was able to build a way more attractive and successful platform to the point there is no actual competition, so PS4 games can be dismissed because they are on this successful hardware?

Great logic, U4 is not impressive because Sony nailed what people want and Nintendo didn't...

PS4 is impressive, U4 is not. Nintendo has many franchises that sell better and only cost a fraction of the money and time that is required to develop a game like U4. Besides, isn't U4 heavily bundled anyway?

Saying UC4 isn't impressive, are you a litle crazy?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."