SonytendoAmiibo said:
The point has been stated about 100 times now. Surprisingly you have not noticed it. Fact: Digital Foundry uses outdated info to substantiate their claims. Fact: Digital Foundry uses assumptions to substantiate their claims. Fact: Digital Foundry knowingly receives info that is protected by a legally binding NDA agreement. The information was not meant to be revealed to the public and is not yet finalized by the companies involved for public release. These are the things we are discussing here. But since you have made Digital Foundry an untouchable deity who can never do wrong, maybe you should just agree to disagree and leave it at that. |
They aren't making claims. How many times does it need to be pointed out that they aren't claiming to KNOW what's going on with these systems. They are speculating based on the information they have and their experience with gaming hardware.
They aren't giving out "misinformation" They're speculating on information they've recieved by people who, yes, are breaking NDAs (the worst crime in the world, apparently). Something they make abundantly clear in their content.
But no no, everyone else here is a lemming and a fool and you alone are the beacon of truth and reason. There's absolutely no way that you're just don't have any idea what you're talking about.
Bet with Adamblaziken:
I bet that on launch the Nintendo Switch will have no built in in-game voice chat. He bets that it will. The winner gets six months of avatar control over the other user.







