Your false assumptions will get you nowhere

[Pavolink]

CGI-Quality said:

Pavolink said:

Easy. The main premise of the thread is that people wrongly assume Wii U failed and Switch will solely because shitty graphics in a world where the recent Wii, DS, and even 3DS exists. Even more if we count past hardware as GB and GBA.

 

That does not mean there aren't other factors that will make fail a console like droughts, price, architecture, etc. But only shitty graphics is not the only reason Wii U failed or a reason for Switch to fail.

This is a start, though not from the TC. Issue is, had the narrative only been that the Wii U failed because of "shitty graphics", then that'd be a cause for alarm. But we've had plenty of threads that document the overall problems the system faced and that is one of the reasons this thread is a head-scratcher for people.

It's not my thread, and I don't know who are that people assuming Wii U failed because shitty graphics, but the definitive rebuttal is there in my post. As I mentioned, there are other factors, but I want to believe that OP is tired to see the old "shitty graphics" is the only reason to fail.

 

Lack of power is something more sophisticated to say, and it holds true. But it was only one of the hundreds problems that Nintendo had last gen (and some looks like to be still on the Switch).