sc94597 said:
Yet the definition I posted is still a valid, and works in the way we are using it. |
No, because your definition fails to put any constraints on why you are avoiding something.
Someone doesn't have a TV so they are boycotting Blu-Ray.
A war vet lost his legs so he is boycotting shoes.
Someone doesn't like peanuts so they are boycotting Peanut M&Ms.
Somoene doesn't know how to use the English language, so they are boycotting the rational use of definitions on the VGChartz forums.
See how silly your definition sounds?
I give that post a 9.0.
Thank god for the disable signatures option.