By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Zekkyou on 24 January 2017
Edit Thread
Snoopy said:
Barkley said:

So... you're agreeing with our point that you should use proportions or not?

Because your Forza Horizon comment completley agrees with us, while your sentence before the bolded disagrees.

Yes the difference between XBO and 360 might not be the "biggest upgrade" as you say, a numerical increase of 1TF, but Proportionally it is very big, (445% increase)

Because of the massive increase proportionally the difference is, Night and Day.

Everything can be proportional. However, the difference between xbox 360 and xbox one is 1tflops and look what it acheived. Now imagine what difference can be acheived between 6 tflops and 4 tlops. Or if we compare it to base xbox one 1.4tflops vs 6tflops. That is MASSIVE. 4k native should be a sure thing for most games going by microsoft heads about their first party games. Also, we should see some lock 60fps which is important for a lot of games.

Ignoring that using flops in this context is a bit silly, relativism is still king. If it wasn't, we'd consider the jump from the 360 to X1 as being several times larger than the jump between the Atari 2600 and the 360. In reality, that's not even a niche opinion.

It's not like we even need to discuss hypotheticals either. You tell us to image what can be achieved with 2tf compared to 1, yet with the Pro we already have an example of a jump of almost 3tf over the X1. The end result is certainly very nice, but it's hardly the generation-defining leap you appear to think 2tf will achieve.