grimygunz on 02 June 2008
| trestres said: @Grimygunz: You don't seem too intelligent at all. First of all, Red Steel was bought because of the hype it got before it was launched, and because it was a LAUNCH title, there wasn't much to play on the Wii at that time. Second: NMH was developed by a team who has developed good games, but none of them sold at least 1/3 of NMH. NMH is considered to be succesful by them, in fact their first success, after Killer7 sold TERRIBLY BAD on a userbase of 100 million (at the time). @Rocketpig: Ubisoft made promises to their old followers, a lot of them from the GC, they promised good games or at least QUALITY games, they have to be ashamed after saying we would see SMG or MP3 like quality from them, ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT. I couldn't care less if they decided not to develop for the Wii anymore, but lie to us like that? Did you ever see the examples of games he gave? Driver(Terrible port), PoP(Quick cash in) and Red Steel (Bad game that sold well cause it was a launch title). @All haters: I think the people who call us whiners are the little kiddos in the end, that can't stand Wii gamers get some good games, or you just bitch for no reason since WE DO HAVE A REASON to show our disgust, you don't. |
THe point i was making is that red steel wasn't as good as NMH and sold more. Do you think that most gamers have a clue about the creator of 90% of the game that come out. killer 7 sold bad cause it was EXtreamly different from everything else at the time.
From ubisoft perspective do you honestly think it make a difference that red steel was a luanch title. Luanching with zelda the same week oppose to a game coming out with endless ocean in the same week. The sales are whats gunna talk for them and sales of core games dont seem to be on the rise for them on the Wii. And a boycott on the by wii owners will only push them further away from a system that im sure they want to make good games for.
