By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ratuscafoarterea on 24 January 2017
Edit Thread
WolfpackN64 said:
ratuscafoarterea said:

"Wilders rise in popularity signifies problems in Dutch society, which the liberals have faild to resolve."

that sounds a whole lot like the American elections, you know, how the Democrats even failed to recognize problem in the American society, and we know how that end up. Also, my point that those Tv personalities, they don’t = Netherlands and the Dutch people still stands up. Also, you haven’t answered my question on regards to what makes the guy a nazi, in your opinion. You avoid it like the plague.

 

What makes Wilders a fascist? Let's see. Blaming minorities for: leeching social profits, stealing jobs (quite contradictory to the first one), claiming to defend "Dutch values" (it seems he missed the virtue of tolerance and basic human decency), claiming to be for "the people" (even though more then half of the Dutch populace doesn't really like him at all) and claiming to be against an elite which is "politically correct" (the Dutch PM is an ass* already so no real need there).

Those are all symptoms of what they like to describe themself as "new realism". In the US, you know this movement as the "alt-right", the core of which, is made up by neo-nazis.

While I'm against liberalism myself, since it instigates inequality, which causes competition between people (and thus also hatred). The solution to this problem is confronting the economic system together, not attacking certain people because they're different and because integration is in itself a difficult process that can and nearly always will cause friction.

See, I don't live in Netherlands , but what you've described sounds familiar, as in someone that actually is in for his country and his people.

You say “Blaming minorities for: leeching social profits, stealing jobs” and you don’t even mention what minorities. Immigrants? Gypsies? Germans ? What minorities you’re talking about? Not mentioning makes it vague, it’s like you have no point. Then, later on you say “The solution to this problem is confronting the economic system together, not attacking certain people because they're different and because integration is in itself a difficult process that can and nearly always will cause friction.” No, that’s not true, we all know about no go zones for white native people in Western Europe. Are you going to blame that on the economy, or realize that some people of different culture don’t want to change and integrate into the European culture.

Then you say “claiming to defend "Dutch values"” have you ever think that by that he means defending the Dutch culture/identity?