By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
RolStoppable said:
badgenome said:
Because they're bad.

That's too obvious of an explanation. Has to be something else.

Phil Spencer is secretly a super villain. He has a forked tongue and eats babies for breakfast.

aLkaLiNE said:
KLAMarine said:

http://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/take+at+face+value

I don't.

Indifferent. I'm not a VR investor.

Well if Microsoft is being called out for a practice, as aLkaLiNe I think will agree, is widespread, why not Sony too?

We do want to be fair, right?

What I'm trying to say is it's not unusual or odd that Sony doesn't release VR headset numbers because that market is infant and literally no headset maker is releasing numbers. So, no numbers for VR is currently the norm.

But considering VR's infancy, wouldn't VR sales numbers be even more critical than console numbers? PSVR is an add-on for the PS4 and if there is to be significant third party development for the PSVR, I think you'll agree it's important that it sell well.

aLkaLiNE said:

What isn't and hasn't been the norm is reporting monthly active users in place of sell in numbers for consoles which is why people are looking at Microsoft with a magnifying glass.

Do you understand?

I understand. What I don't understand is people jumping down Phil's throat.