By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Intrinsic on 17 January 2017
Edit Thread
dahuman said:
Faelco said:

Nintendo could charge $600 for the console and it would still be excused, with "$600 is worth it to play the Wii U Zelda but in slightly better conditions". 

 

Of course being unable to charge while playing is unacceptable in 2017. I already had this issue once, with my Wiimote and the rechargeable battery I had, and it's awful not being able to play when you have time because you forgot to charge it beforehand.

 

But hey, like when you were not supposed to be able to play the Xbox One when not connected to Internet once a day, it's the consumer's fault for not preparing his gaming sessions properly, right? 

remember...... nothing gets excused at that price..... nothing.....

That didn't get excused though. Not at all..... that little stunt cost sony that generation. Even though even at that price sony were selling each console at a loss of over $200!!!! Sony didn't get excused for that even though they literally gave all and the kitchen sink in that $600 box. But yet something as obvious and a s cheap as a little convenience feature gets excused from nintendo?

Honestly, I would have no isse with this at all if there wasnt a seperate grip priced at $30 that does just that. Whats even funny is that the chareless grip is priced at $10. So basically nintendo is charging $20 extra for a USB port?