thismeintiel said:
Well, glad it looks fun to you. But, I highly doubt it will be successful. Not with the ads I've seen for it. Eating a hamburger? Counting balls? Only thing remotely interesting about it is the quickdraw, but most people are still going to rather play a video game on TV. Even with the Wii, Nintendo knew this. And definitely not $350 worth of content there. As for Move, maybe you are missing my point. Wouldn't be the first time. I just said that MOTION CONTROLS ARE A GIMMICK AND PEOPLE ARE GETTING TIRED OF GIMMICKS. Again, look at the failure of Wii U and Kinect for evidence. How does that translate to I want Nintendo to make Move games. I'm just saying if they HAVE to make motion control games, there are options. Personally, and I think most would agree (especially before the reveal), they just want Nintendo to make good games that don't force gimmicks into them. Something they can definitely do as a 3d party. |
Success is irrelevant to what I said. I said it looks fun, and would not be replicable on the other two consoles. Success doesn't matter. The Dreamcast wasn't a success yet was an amazing console filled to the brim with quality, innovative software. I am sure the latest Britney Spears album is a success, yet I'll still gladly say no thanks.
Wii U failed because of software and marketing, not gimmicks. Either way, not relevant to how fun the game looks or how possible it might be utilizing niche, optional extra hardware on other platforms.
They can make great games without gimmicks on their own platforms. They have each gen, no reason they won't this gen.
Essay Pro