Einsam_Delphin said:
Oh, then the comparison doesn't really make sense. Games aren't a service or utility, it's a product you can own. It would only work if you didn't already have to buy the game and if how much you payed was based on exactly how much you played. Also do you realize that online is free right now for Nintendo and PC games? Of course people are gonna expect it to stay that way, because there's no reason it can't be free if it is already. |
But ONLINE SERVICES ARE A SERVICE OR UTILITY. Do you ever wonder why sites like Wikipedia ask for money to keep their site up? It costs money to keep up a server. I'm referring to online services, not games. Where'd you get games from? Online is free for those devices now, but for Nintendo that's because they kept paying out of pocket to keep their servers up. If it didn't cost anything to run a server, we'd still have Mario Kart DS Servers and Devil's Third servers. Nintendo was nice enough to allow free online. Like I said, Sony and Microsoft don't make you pay because they're dicks. There's a reason. PS3 had free online for a while, but then they realized they could make money off it.
Please see this reddit post to understand how it works and why companies charge what they charge: https://www.reddit.com/r/gaming/comments/2ve5m4/how_much_does_it_actually_cost_a_company_to_run/