| bdbdbd said: Those games did not sell Gamecube. The consept of a second screen isn't bad (even if the price is hard to justify), what's bad, is that the screen is forced for some secondary function in almost all of the games - which is a software problem, not hardware. Attach rate doesn't matter. Sales do. High attach rate only tells there are not many games to buy on a system. People bought Wiis to play Mario Kart, not the other way around. Fans do not prefer Mario Kart 8, which is proven by its sales. The casual gamers play largely what's popular at moment, it is the core audience of the industry. This is the people that play FIFA and COD. |
That is a terrible argument he's right your logic has no ground here, MK8 for a start has outsold the majority of games this gen while being on the smallest userbase this highly contradicts your argument. Wii was already selling highly and was at around 30m units by the time MK Wii arrived, if Wii U was at the same sales rate we'd be looking at the best selling MK title by miles, people bought Wiis because it was vastly affordable and well marketed.
Attach rate doesn't indicate the aren't any games on a platform by that logic you're saying GTA only sells because the's nothing on the platforms it's on.
