hudsoniscool said:
I'm not making wild assumptions on the hardware though. For ram I was just going off of the bandwidth that Microsoft has already stated 320gbs the pros is 218 gb per second. For gpu I'm going off of the 6tb gpu they already stated. I make the small assumption that it is vega. Which would make it about twice as capable as the pro's gpu. I'm not expecting the CPU to be crazy good or anything. 40% performance increase over the pros isn't that much. Considering the pro has a crap CPU 40% better isn't amazing. I only make 2 assumptions vega gpu and a decent CPU.not an amazing CPU no type ryzen. |
On RAM I saw assumptions that it could be HBM, on GPU Vega and yes there were ryzen for CPU... and while keeping under 400

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







