By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
AngryLittleAlchemist on 10 January 2017
Edit Thread
Intrinsic said:
AngryLittleAlchemist said:

Efficiency?  Lol PS4 is NOT efficient. But I will agree that the price  is at least efficient..... I think that offering it at that price it will do better than t he Xbox Scorpio(unless Scorpio is a full blown console) simply do to the fact that 4k on consoles is mostly a fad. It's like how cheap mobile VR is selling more than PS VR

Efficiency by definition is to make the most out of a limited resource.

 

PS4pro is designed to give 4K like quality with non 4k capable hardware. And we are not just talking software here, it's hardware is specifically designed to that end. 

 

If that isn't efficient to you then I don't know what else is. And then there is also the price. Nothing stopped Sony from making a $500 box. Or even a $600 one. The fact they have the best selling sub $300 box out there have them that kinda leeway. 

 

But instead they chose to come in at $400 but make a $400 box that can push a respectable pseudo 4k image. That's efficiency right there. 

The system overheats, crashes, and runs some games worse than the regular Playstation 4. I completely agree that for wh at it is it is efficient, which is why I said 4k is mostly just a gimmick for consoles and that the price is good. But by definition they should have done better making sure it's failure rate was closer to the original PS4(which had failures...but that's like every console ever. It wasn't nearly as bad as the Pro)