kowenicki said:
So do I... and yes you would notice on a decent latest spec screen. Its inferior. |
Yes, but you put it as if it was so much inferior, and neither the post you gave nor the DF analysis agree with.
Pemalite said:
If the screen was like 75" the difference would be pronounced. |
I apreciate your inputs even when I disagree or don't understand.
And since the games I preffer to play are exclusives to PS4, not even having a very powerfull PC would help me playing them on pristine 4k30fps (60fps was never a requirement for me) and ultra settings. At least on that Xbox folks will get a better deal when talking only about SW.
Considering 1080p have been quite pleasing for my eyes, seeing it get even more clarity and precision will probably add a lot more without need for me to beating me around for not having it 4k.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







