Imaginedvl said:
This is wrong in several ways imo. First of all, the Play Station Four is also not powerfull enough for VR based on what is required on the PC side but Sony developped their own (less requiring and poerformant) VR (and I'm not blasting it, I think Play Station VR is just great and would love to see something similar on the Xbox One even if not as good as Oculus or HTC). So nothing is preventing Microsoft to do the same and I'm actually curious about those headsets coming for 200$ this year and see what will be the requirments. Second, you assume that VR will play a huge part. Where do you get that? And finally, where did you get that about the Scorpio replacing the Xbox One? I never saw anything like that. Quite the opposite actually from Microsoft |
When very weak cellphones using a cardboard headset can make VR, there is no limitation as to prevent MS if willing to have a VR that works with X1 og or X1S. I just don't know if they are willing, but if PSVR had catched fire then MS would be looking deeper at making their attempt or paying a dev already with prototypes to make a capable version for X1

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







