| Entropio said: I was a big hyperbolic, but that's the impression that, in my opinion, people got from that rumour. Anyway, the rumour states that in 2013 the game didn't exist (something that the studio denied iirc, so if true they would have lied), and that in 2016 "basically there wasn't a game". We've seen gameplay trailers of games that released many years later so I don't know why this case should be different. Maybe the developers hadn't design yet compelling game mechanics and they needed some years to design those, but it's a bit different than "the trailer is fake" About the lack of game, I think that it's pretty much clear that when Sony dropped the game there were a game (maybe a bad one, we'll see), since it's releasing this May. I understand that changing developers is a clear red flag, but what pisses me is the credibility that that rumour gets, still with no proofs. The rumour, again iirc, also talked about problems invited the studio and the company CEO being a notary (I can't see the problem here, but some people seems outraged, again the evidence presented was very weak - there's a notary in Vitoria whose name coincides with the CEO's one. Ok) Edit: I've made a little research and this is true, again I can't see the problem. I have no interest in the game, and I understand the lost of hype, but this kind of rumour are very bad for the industry. |
I agree, these rumors do hurt the industry. Yet game development is a very secretive business for some reason giving room for these rumors to grow. However NMS and Peter Molyneux showed being open can be a lot worse :/ It's no Spintires mess at least.
