By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
REDZONE on 03 January 2017
Edit Thread
Azzanation said:
Rafie said:

I never said that it wouldn't run better. What I said how do you figure that it would. There is no proof that you can provide to say that 1st party games from PS3 would run better on 360. Virtually no proof at all.

I already gave you the reason why multiplats performed bettter on 360 than PS3. They were developed on the 360, and then ported to PS3.

Halo 4 was a beautiful game. It's subjective to say it looked better than most 1st party games on PS3. Although I agree to a degree. What about most 1st party games on PS3? I don't want to start naming games and it turns into a list war. I'm not interested in that. Also we're off topic and I don't wanna be warned. So yes the point is still valid.

Forza 4 looked marginally better in some aspects than GT5. Still, I do agree about Forza 4 looking better.

Well isnt that proof? Both Racing sims, both 1st party games pushing there systems to the limits and you agree in saying FM4 looks better.

Give or take both systems are very similar however Xbox can be pushed more with being alot more balanced and easier to develope for and had less bottlenecks.

Like i said before making a system with power with less bottlenecks is a challenge in itself. PS3 was all grunt no control. 360 had both. Cell had overheating problems hence why it was delayed when used to its fullest by devs. (Think of it as a Car with more Traction vs a Car with more Horsepower, which will run the track better? Of course the Car with more Traction) This is why i say the 360 was a more powerful system, because it was more powerful all round.

Ryse was the best looking game for 2 years on release when launched on XB1, that doesnt mean XB1 was more powerful than PS4, thats under the dev and what they wanted to achieve. Sony games always tend to push visuals while Xbox tend to be the other way around, abit like Nintendo who dont focus on visuals yet can make beauitful looking games when they want to eg. Metriod Prime (GC).

REDZONE said:

Hahaha.I've seen a lot of bs posted on this site but this tops it.Did you not see me say it was hard to program for.Let me break it down.

1.Developers were lazy to even try to give the PS3 proper ports,instead gave  half as ports(beacause it wasn't market leader)

2.So why didn't MS first party games looked better than they PS3 counterparts,since they were the ones who took them to their full potential.

 

3.Later on in the gen when games started to use the PS3 as the lead platform they looked better than the 360.

So there's them facts for ya.

Lazy is an excuse. I already stated above comparing 2 similar games both 1st party games and both pushing there hardware to the limits.

Go do some comparing yourself. End of day is many games run better on 360 hardware and even 1st party games in there respected genres favored this.

eg. Forza 4 vs GT5

I wont be commenting anymore on this thread so good luck in trying to convince yourself. I am not turning this thread into a fanwar.  

Really Forza and GT5?OK I will bite.1000 cars to what,400?Day night cycle,dynamic weather and more cars on track at a time,while still looking damn good.And you think Forza 4 looks good because of hardware?Haha.On to Halo 4 both KillZone 2 and 3 looks better so yeah there's that.Another exclusive please.