aLkaLiNE said:
Gonna shoot this reply at both of you, but there was a reason I cited PlayStations own store and microsofts own store DIRECTLY instead of relying on Wikipedia; Wikipedia is not by any stretch of the imagination accurate and can't be counted on as reliable. Simply skimming through the list you will see that each also includes upcoming games or games without release dates, taking For Honor or Crackdown 3 as an example. For that reason alone those lists are worthless to me, but you can be sure that each are riddled with other errors as well. |
Noworry... Store or Wikipedia... the data is so divergent from 95% that either prove there isn't a shred of truth in it.
DraconianAC said:
Does that mean you think I'm being socratic? You know, in the way I expressed my opinion? |
Nope. Just that perhaps you were under the notion that you would have to change a console much faster than you first assumed but haven't realized that what you are doing (not buying the mid-gen) is basically fulfilling your expectation of 7year gen for the console (unless PS5 is lurking in the corner)

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







