By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
REDZONE on 03 January 2017
Edit Thread
Azzanation said:
REDZONE said:

Lol wut?MS had one console more powerful than Sony it was the OG Xbox and that was because it came 4 years later.Xbox 360>PS3?Lol no.It was hard to program for but First party exclusives spoke.The cell was a beast.It did had more ram tho.

How can you compare 1st party games? Different focuses in game design. I can bet you if PS exclusives crossed over to 360 it would run them better. Sony made a powerful system with so many bottlenecks it turned out worse.

If majority of 3rd party games ran better on the 360 than most likely it would run there 1st party games too. So yes 360 was a much better well balanced system than the PS3 and it was outperforming it on more occasions. Thats a fact not a opinion.

Hahaha.I've seen a lot of bs posted on this site but this tops it.Did you not see me say it was hard to program for.Let me break it down.

1.Developers were lazy to even try to give the PS3 proper ports,instead gave  half as ports(beacause it wasn't market leader)

2.So why didn't MS first party games looked better than they PS3 counterparts,since they were the ones who took them to their full potential.

 

3.Later on in the gen when games started to use the PS3 as the lead platform they looked better than the 360.

So there's them facts for ya.