By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kasz216 said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
Kasz216 said:
Hm. He was told he had to make a Wii title. Either way, the game looks like it has a lot of potential.

Me I'd perfer if developers would be given the choice which console to work on without being given any guidelines.

It would let those with good creative ideas for the Wii work on the wii... and those who are going to create nothing but your average game work on the 360/PS3. If your not going to bring anything new to the table why make an average game with average graphics when you could make an average game with good graphics.


Well the HD game for that studio was already taken by the guy doing Bayonetta (aka it's like Bullet Witch, but will actually kick ass).


Yeah. I guess you do have to think of profitability at some point.

It's not like developers can be short of ideas or something. I mean I have atleast 2-3 ideas per genre I'd like to make if I had any sort of programming ability. This must be even higher for those who actually have the talent to do it.


And I guess they decided one game had to be a Wii game because either a) they wanted to see what they could do with it, or b) they wanted to prove they weren't some HD eletists (and not just a certain company that starts with a U), or both a and b. 



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs