By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sethnintendo said:
AsGryffynn said:

Most importantly, nothing they'd have done might warrant responses. They literally aired Clinton's dirty laundry and didn't air Trump's and hacked into political parties, not the government. Political parties ARE NOT the government and shouldn't be considered part of it. Barry's literally taking a very partisan approach to this and capitalizing on Republican fears. After all, who says they are safe, it might have been them and not the Democratic Party that was scared. 

But in the end, it all points to one thing and one thing only: Lack of transparency. 

God only knows what dirt they uncovered on the Republicans.  Republicans like to think they stand on the high moral ground cause of anti abortion, religion, etc...  However, when you have people like Dennis Hastert, Newt Gingrich, Mark Sanford, Mark Foley, and many more in your party then you know there are many uncovered skeletons in the closet.

I am sure wikileaks has things on the Republican Party, but I doubt it's that damning. Trump himself has already been relieved of all or almost all of his skeletons and he still won the election. The whole point of draining the swamp is to get the hypocritical Republicans out so we can get people who walk the walk as well as less neocons. It really just depends on the timing when it comes to the leaks because if they wait till general elections then obviously it's too late for the GOP to react and they will be stuck with bad candidates with scandal. However, it would actually benefit the party if done prior to the primaries. Using Hastert or Foley as proof of anything when they represent two people versus 300+ of Republicans currently in congress. Having 1 or 2 scandals by a politician that is no where near the top of the party per cycle isn't very much to go off of. Democrats meanwhile had corruption at the highest level of the party including fixing the primary election for Hillary and controlling the media in her favor. It's a night and day difference.