UnderstatedCornHole said:
That's true. Stupid people peddle a narrative that is stupid. Intelligent people peddle a narrative that is not stupid. The stupid people don't know they are stupid because they are so stupid. The intelligent people know they are not stupid. This gives the illusion that nobody's narrative is more or less stupid and it goes to the realm of subjectivity etc. This is a FALLACY. If you analyse the FACTS here, we have a stupid group who doesn't know what it's talking about and an intelligent group that does. Just because the stupid people are too stupid to acknowledge how stupid they are doesn't make their opinion subjectively valid. The "stupid people" and the "intelligent people" are substitute phrases for the left and the right, I won't say who is who. One deals in ideoligy, the other deals in substantive facts. |
Yes, I would have to agree.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."