By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
CGI-Quality said:
jason1637 said:

Disagree with things his company has done in the past that he had no involvement in doesn't make his statement hyproactial. It just means he doesn't support the buisness practices MS has done before he became head of Xbox.

Negative. If he engaged in it, at any point, he's being hypocritical here. No amount of excusing it will eliminate that. He may have had a change of heart (market positions can obviously effect that), but he certainly can be linked directly to a scenario he now condemns.

It's so perfectly clear. I'm in shock this has gone on for 250 posts. The number of mental gymnastics being performed here, to protect a corporation and its millionaire manager, is really outrageous.