palou said:
Saying that a politician is responsible for individual death cases is ridiculous. Only statistics can reveal truth when dealing with a sample of 80 000 000 people. All decisions that someone in that position takes will lead to some deaths; it's their job to evaluate where more is to gain and what needs to be sacrificed. During Merkel's reign, overall, the number of violent deaths has gone down, statistically. While this most definately cannot all be attributed to her, for the very least, it's enough to make any accusations of murder unfounded. |
yeah she is, not even the CSU wanted to let the refugees in, she made this decision all by her self above the party
RolStoppable said:
Maybe, but it would be for different reasons than you think. Terrorism wasn't initiated by migration. The first major target of IS was France which coincidentally has their military forces in regions where IS groups want to take over. The attacks in France have also had much higher death counts than those in Germany. Merkel greenlit support for the French forces in whatever countries they operate, so Germany became a target for terrorism by extension. Germany also happens to be top dog in EU, they and France alone have run the EU for the most part. The migration crisis has allowed criminals to easily get within the EU, but even without the entire migration politics, terrorism would have found its way to Europe. At times terrorists happen to be radicalized natives, after all. It shouldn't be forgotten that regardless of who is in charge of German politics, the root cause of all the tragic events would still exist: Those guys in the Middle East who have lost their marbles and believe that they fight a holy war. There's no simple solution like "Stop immigration!" |
Well shes pro Nato and America so shes responsible for those wars as well, her open border policies increased danger segnifcantley.
