Ka-pi96 said:
WolfpackN64 said:
So what other neighbouring region would you know of that would cause large scale migration to Europe? Africa has always been a steady trickle, but never on the scale that the Syrian and Lybian conflict has escalated. As far as I know, the USA doesn't arm drug militias to fight against Mexico, nor has supported rebel fractions there, so I'm not surprised there is not any noticeable latino terrorism in the US (most terrorism in the US seem to be young white dudes).
Islamic terrorism on the other hand has had decades to grow and fester, also in no small part thanks to the US and Europe. But the first decade, it was largely assassinations against local rulers to try and get power. That didn't really work out, so they started targeting government officials of all kinds (internal terrorism). Eventually, as any good marketer knows, spectacular adds get a lot of attention so they started aiming their sights at the people they felt wronged them. That took a long time to get there.
On the other hand, you could say the USA has been sponsoring terrorists against Cuba and such, but hey, who am I to judge?
|
Why do you need `large scale migration` to Europe exactly?
And who cares why they become terrorists? That`s irrelevant. If you`ve got the choice between a small number of safe immigrants with very little to no chance of being terrorists or a massive bunch of them that may want to blow things up and kill people it`s not hard to figure out which ones to accept and which ones not to.
|
I never said we needed it. Why they become terrorists is NOT irrelevant if you can actually do something against it.
It isn't hard to see who you want to accept if Europe had a well regulated immigration program, screening people would have been very do-able. Now everyone is just running around the place screaming not knowing what to do.
