Khuutra on 31 May 2008
| kingofwale said: Okay, I will bite first. Personally I have no question with the integrity of reviewers. There are bad ones out there.. (Gamespot), but most of them are good. the latest controversy (if it can be even called) is merely another form of attack on so called "game reviewer" by Nintendo fans. It started with WiiSport, and every other games that didn't get SMG score. They go from claiming reviewers are biased, to claiming they don't know how to review "new brand" of gaming, to downright dismiss them as "hating on Nintendo" Frankly, I don't care, game reviews lived for as long as it did, it will live through this. |
Mmm. Fair point, but not what I mean to ask. This isn't about reviewers: this is about reviews themselves. Not their current state, but what they would be ideally.
What do you think is the ideal form of a review?
