curl-6 said:
Miyamotoo said:
Article saying that Pascal chips were not ready for Switch on time.
"Nvidia introduced its new Pascal architecture earlier this year, but that technology is not ready for the Tegra chip going into the Switch.
In the meantime, however, some fans might find it disappointing that Nintendo is using the Maxwell chip in the Switch instead of Pascal. But the timing just didn’t work out for Nintendo. Sources told GamesBeat that the Kyoto-based Japanese company is in such a rush that it can’t wait for the Pascal version of the Tegra. That’s both because the publisher wants to replace the failing Wii U and because it wants to strike quickly with its hybrid concept before a competitor can introduce a better product. That happened with the Wii U when — after years of development — Nintendo introduced its tablet-like Gamepad to consumers who had been using Apple’s iPads for the previous 24 months. If Nintendo decided to use Pascal in the Switch, it would have no choice but to delay the system and risk a similar situation."
|
Honestly, I don't think this is such a big deal. Maxwell is already good enough.
Switch doesn't need to compete with PS4 in power; even a stock Tegra X1 would be enough to surpass Wii U graphics, which is pretty damn good for a portable device. Nintendo's games already looked great at Wii U spec, so 500 Gigaflops is more than they need.
|
Agree, but article is a little strange, they saying it has power more than 1TF and that would be too much for Tegra and some realistic expectations are 500-600 Gigaflops.
