| Intrinsic said: Yes, we should wait for official info, bevause right now and switch related info is literally a crap shoot. For everyone thing you can say, there will be something else said that proves otherwise. And the Maxwell architecture can be as advanced as it wants, it's still not going to hold a candle to the HD twins. I don't know how anyone looks at this, if the XB1 struggles to run games at 900p, people somehow think the Switch with around half the power of the XB1 will somehow match running the same games the XB1 is running? What kimda sorcery is that? Even if running at 720p, a lot of concessions would have to be made. And if it's using the Maxwell architecture, all this talk of half the power of the XB1 wouldn't even be true, that can only happen if it were using Pascal which would have allowed it run at higher clocks while churning out less heat. Anyways, we will find out soon enough. |
Even if the Switch we're using the Pascal architecture it still can't come anywhere near half of the X1 in terms of raw compute power, maybe a third but definitely not a half ...
The laws of physics should be able to preclude the Switch from getting most of the AAA games built specifically for the HD twins ...
I have no faith in the Switch getting ports from HD twins when it's brother struggles with ports from sub-HD twins LOL ...
Metal Gear Rising: Revengeance - (half the framerate of the Xbox 360)
Resident Evil 5 - (no anti-aliasing, worse performance and textures compared to the Xbox 360)
And that's the best the mighty Switch is going to do ?! LMAO ...
