Soundwave said:
Use some freaking common sense, lol. It's not a "liberal fallacy", if Saudi Arabia was doing the same (active hacking Trump's emails and then getting a Secretary of State elected that was three feet up their asshole) there would be large raising of eyebrows on the right and I would AGREE with that too. This whole situation is fairly troubling. I notice none of you guys have much to say either when it comes to Trump choosing several high level Goldman Sachs folkes for his cabinet either (including the freaking president of Goldman Sachs), after spending months hammering Trump's opponents for ties to Goldman Sachs. War on elitists my ass. |
Good lord, what's your conclusion then and why. This is just more hysteria.
The only facts you have are that there is a potential motive for abuse of power. That could be found in any cabinet pick, you are presuming that Russia has interfered in the election and then because Trump has picked someone who has had ties to Russia that the latter proves the former.
The former has yet to be proven or evidence shown, your argument falls flat on it's face as a result for the latter.
That is logic fallacy, please address it.
