By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
deskpro2k3 said:
UnderstatedCornHole said:

The thread title, which you created was about how Russia allegedly helped Trump to get elected. That notion has been discredited having no source or validity. You then bring up the issue of Donald Trump refusing to throw away his right to contest an election if it so happens that it appears that irregularities appear. He was honest about his stance and you interpret this as "Donald Trump refuses to accept results of election if he loses".

That interpretation is based on your own bias because his words were clear and non-commital.

Semantics is just another word for refusing to explain yourself.

 

Again what you're "calling out on" is on a your hunch, a feeling, nothing, your own emotions..

Me being bias is your own delusion. the thread is based on what the CIA said to the Senate, and it just so happens they're withholding details from the public. What we do know is that the investigation is still going on. Another fact you refuse to accept I might add.

I brought up the issue of Trump not accepting the results as a joke to someone else, because trump refuse to give a straight answer to a yes or no question, and no nominee has ever done that before. That was the point.

Having to simplifly something in so many different ways to someone who refuse to accept it begs the question. What is your agenda here?

Remember earlier when I said I deal with "knowns" and you made a mockery of it.

You fill in the gaps of unknowns with your own liberal bias and Trump hate.

You saying that I'm going on hunches/feelings/emotions is contradicts your previous remarks and mine. There are very few facts here, the rest is your own hysteria and presumption.

I keep asking you to be specific on your remarks but each time I get a wave of liberal talking points.