deskpro2k3 said:
irstupid said:
Remember back in the repulican primaries.
Trump refused to say he would support the nominee. He got huge boos. Everyone else pledged to suppport the future nominee. (Now I agree with Trump. Why should one pledge to support someone, when you don't know who that person will be or their views/ect)
But fast forward to Trump winning the nomination. Plenty of those very same republicans who boo'd him, and even those who pledged to support did the very thing they critiqued him about. They didn't support the nominee. Or in this case Trump.
Fast foward to election time. Trump doesn't promise to accept the results. He gets huge outcry and booing. Fast forward and those same hypocrites are now not accepting the results.
So tell me this. Who is worse. Someone who won't blindly accept an unknown outcome, or people who decry something they later end up doing?
|
I think they accept the results, but not his credibility to run a country, also to put more fuel on the fire, what the CIA brought up to the senate just made the blaze higher.
|
Not his credibility to run a country? Based on what? They are just assuming. Give him at least a chance to fail before you label him worst pres ever.
CIA brought up that Russia influenced election, and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, which oversees the U.S. intelligence community, has not fully embraced that CIA finding.
