By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
deskpro2k3 on 13 December 2016
Edit Thread
irstupid said:
deskpro2k3 said:

 

 

Now you're basically saying what's the problem if he didn't give an answer.. see how easy you switch gears to help your own rambling?

Let me hit you with some facts, and then we'll stay on topic. he is the first president nominee to refuse to say he'll accept the results. okay? What does that tell you about what he thinks about democracy? Don't even try to sugar-coat that because you might just eat that up too.

Answer that if you will, but I ain't going to listen to any of your hunches or gut feelings on this anymore, this is getting no where.

Remember back in the repulican primaries.

Trump refused to say he would support the nominee. He got huge boos. Everyone else pledged to suppport the future nominee. (Now I agree with Trump. Why should one pledge to support someone, when you don't know who that person will be or their views/ect)

But fast forward to Trump winning the nomination. Plenty of those very same republicans who boo'd him, and even those who pledged to support did the very thing they critiqued him about. They didn't support the nominee. Or in this case Trump.

Fast foward to election time. Trump doesn't promise to accept the results. He gets huge outcry and booing. Fast forward and those same hypocrites are now not accepting the results.

So tell me this. Who is worse. Someone who won't blindly accept an unknown outcome, or people who decry something they later end up doing?

 

I think they accept the results, but not his credibility to run a country, also to put more fuel on the fire, what the CIA brought up to the senate just made the blaze higher.