By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
UnderstatedCornHole on 13 December 2016
Edit Thread
deskpro2k3 said:
UnderstatedCornHole said:

Switching gears? Nothing of the sort.

You introduced a question that has no relevance and (AGAIN) I called you out on it.

How about you give me a straight answer and instead of non substantive weasil words, outline exactly what Trump has done that is so wrong. Going against convention or past protocol is excaltly what people like about Trump.

When asked if he will accept the results of the election he said he will see at the time and would not commit. There is nothing wrong with that. There's nothing wrong with questioning the results of the election if there are irregularities in voting. There weren't so no need to contest.

The very fact you need to puppet this MSM line is telling as it has nothing to do with the thread and seems like extreme reaching.

 

you did not call out on anything.. and for the rest of your rambling in that post... are you freaking blind? if there is anything to call out on, it's you having a problem with semantics.

The thread title, which you created was about how Russia allegedly helped Trump to get elected. That notion has been discredited having no source or validity. You then bring up the issue of Donald Trump refusing to throw away his right to contest an election if it so happens that it appears that irregularities appear. He was honest about his stance and you interpret this as "Donald Trump refuses to accept results of election if he loses".

That interpretation is based on your own bias because his words were clear and non-commital.

Semantics is just another word for refusing to explain yourself.