deskpro2k3 said:
Now you're basically saying what's the problem if he didn't give an answer.. see how easy you switch gears to help your own rambling? Let me hit you with some facts, and then we'll stay on topic. he is the first president nominee to refuse to say he'll accept the results. okay? What does that tell you about what he thinks about democracy? Don't even try to sugar-coat that because you might just eat that up too. Answer that if you will, but I ain't going to listen to any of your hunches or gut feelings on this anymore, this is getting no where. |
Switching gears? Nothing of the sort.
You introduced a question that has no relevance and (AGAIN) I called you out on it.
How about you give me a straight answer and instead of non substantive weasil words, outline exactly what Trump has done that is so wrong. Going against convention or past protocol is excaltly what people like about Trump.
When asked if he will accept the results of the election he said he will see at the time and would not commit. There is nothing wrong with that. There's nothing wrong with questioning the results of the election if there are irregularities in voting. There weren't so no need to contest.
The very fact you need to puppet this MSM line is telling as it has nothing to do with the thread and seems like extreme reaching.







