UnderstatedCornHole said:
Out of pretence? Please explain, I've rebutted your ponts, if you can't do the same or you are using ideoligy then say as such because it seems we ideologically trust different things. If you trust the CIA word for word without providing any evidence at all and not even making a specific accusation then please say that. By doing that, there doesn't need to be a negative ending and we can agree to disagree. Or you could, you know, change your opinion. |
Lets go back down memory lane.
"What did Russia do? Right now they're denying everything, meanwhile all the evidence from the CIA ongoing investigation says otherwise."
Where in this statement did I say I trust what the CIA said? I remember saying I'll leave it to the professionals to explain the outcome of the investigation.
It's understandable that some information have to be kept a secret for national secuirty, but at this moment they're pushing in the senate to make such secrets involving this case declassified.
So here comes you. no sources but just a hunch. I hope we can put this behind us now.
