UnderstatedCornHole said:
If you are accepting the statement from the CIA that "Russia promoted Trump" with no further elaboration or any actual accusation then I don't really have anything to say as that is closed loop logic and there is no debate to be had. I don't know what your talking about regarding Facebook/Youtube. My "evidence" is that the statement is vague and there is no specific accusation. Can you please tell me how you think Russia has interfered with the election? One example please that also didn't take place on the democratic side and thus create an unfair playing field. I've already stated Morocco donated nearly 10 Million dollars behind closed doors and there is a history of Saudi Arabia doing the same, and more. But that's not the disucssion so please stick to the bolded and enlighten me as to why I am wrong and you are right to accept the CIA's vague statement with no facts. |
If you are accepting the statement from the CIA that "Russia promoted Trump"..etc etc
First all of, I only report what I see from credible news sources, as you can see in the OP. oh and I made a small statement at the end. If you check my past threads, you'll see that I only report.
"I don't know what your talking about regarding Facebook/Youtube."
You said and I quote "I deal in knowns and work from there." I'm asking about where do you get your "knowns" so I can check them out as well to avoid going back and forth in this banter.
Can you please tell me how you think Russia has interfered with the election?
I'll leave that to the professionals to explain, In this case the CIA. you can bet I'll post it here as well, unless someone beat me to it first.