By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
UnderstatedCornHole on 10 December 2016
Edit Thread
deskpro2k3 said:
UnderstatedCornHole said:

That logic is sheer fallacy type thinking and here is why,

There is zero evidence and zero specific accusations against Russia.

Zero, nothing, nada. Just a vague few statements from the democratic staffed offices on democratic payroll who have a conflict of interest.

Without evidence, even a smigen, anything at all to expect, I repeat ANYTHING, no logical person who isn't showing confirmation bias can accept this accusation.

The fact there is absolutely no specifc accusation whatsoever says it all.

Now on the Hillary statement you have fallen into the trap of thinking that all countries that endorsed her, did it formally? Really? What evidence do you have to show that no countries endorsed her behind closed doors? (I'm just using that fallacy to show you what I mean)

Did Morocco endorse her officially with their contribution of 10 million? Did Saudi Arabia officially declare their contributions?

No.

I deal in knowns and work from there.

 

What evidence do you have that says otherwise? Facebook? Youtube? You're just a person like me on the internet. You don't trust what the CIA says, ok fine I don't care, but they're the professionals when it comes to these case.

And isn't it common knowledge that friendly countries would support the candidate that they deemed more worthy? So what evidence do you have that says countries endorsed Hillary behind closed doors in such a way that would question and doubt our democracy?

If you are accepting the statement from the CIA that "Russia promoted Trump" with no further elaboration or any actual accusation then I don't really have anything to say as that is closed loop logic and there is no debate to be had.

I don't know what your talking about regarding Facebook/Youtube.

My "evidence" is that the statement is vague and there is no specific accusation.

Can you please tell me how you think Russia has interfered with the election? One example please that also didn't take place on the democratic side and thus create an unfair playing field.

I've already stated Morocco donated nearly 10 Million dollars behind closed doors and there is a history of Saudi Arabia doing the same, and more. But that's not the disucssion so please stick to the bolded and enlighten me as to why I am wrong and you are right to accept the CIA's vague statement with no facts.